Here comes the shitstorm that our times will be known for.
The fearful worshippers of order will try by any means at their disposal to enforce a singular system of control on this planet. Here, for example, we find the kony meme washed almost clear of the uncontrollable ejaculations of its previous patron. False dichotomy is the shop term for that particular scam. "If war is terrible, then its opposite must be great, right? ...It's for the kids, and... and LOOK! Kittens! ... britney nude xxx superbowl" Will this work for more than a week? I don't know. The people they have raised to respond to this, through a lifetime of oprahaic mush from the teleteat, have frightfully short attention spans. By design they are not meant to be able to think for themselves and will not be able to respond in an intelligible manner to the challenges of "their" logic which is bound to ensue. Religions were able to skate by on "because god", but an immunity to that is now well represented among the people. Similarly, alinsky tactics have been ridden hollow just to ensure another year of bonuses for monsanto and co.
Oh, what a dilemma! To appear grassroots peddling peace, while being hosted by the same circus that brought you the same justifications for war last week. Perhaps it should have popped directly from the gangnam man's crotch. Is it too early for the nymph parade, or has that carrot too been exhausted so that monsanto could see 2014? I can see it already: "Study finds chicks see service to the world order as "highly attractive" quality in bro's." And we thought evolution held for us no more predators to overcome.
How many will endure as people, and how many will become part of a bureaucratic colony organism to lend a false sense of security to the terrified? Unknown. By this ratio the success of the people of this time will be known.
The word terrorist has been corrupted to mean just about anyting that the globalist powers feel nervous about (everything), but if you're looking for the real thing, you need look no further than nelson mandela.
South Africa has for more than a week now, like much of the world, I gather, been in the grips of a 24/7 propaganda campaign whitewashing the image of mandela. They call him the father of the rainbow nation and praise him mostly because "he forgave the people who imprisoned him." The first, like the rainbow nation itself, is a mirage wholly created by the media, starting around 1994. The second is a popular statement to make of mandela, that to the aware person betrays the racist roots in the thinking that led to its creation. This statement is an important thing to point out in a propaganda campaign because it's just about the only positive thing you could say about him, even if it is a lie. Not only does it imply that every white person was responsible for his imprisonment, but it implies that things would've been much worse for white South Africans had he not forgiven us our imagined crimes against his most exulted personage. Since white South Africans have become, by law, second class citizens in the country of our birth anyway, it's easy to assume that this is a threat of actual violence.
The fact is that nelson mandela was until his death, an actual terrorist. He has admitted to mobilising bombings against civilians, and he has never renounced these violent ways. Look up the list of bombings on the 'net, because you won't be told it by the media that not too long ago lent similar support to the invasion of Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and Iran.
After the white government of the 90s decided to open up South Africa to globalist interests, mandela was given the country with no questions asked. He then proceeded to play oprah for the world while the country supposedly under his command started a clear decline in every area except wealth concentration. The party which he brought to power has since thrown South Africa into a pit of corruption, nepotism and incompetence that started with his reign. Our current president is most well known for getting away with rape and keeping his friends out of jail. Our murder rate has become the highest in the world. This is the true legacy of nelson mandela. This is the reason why the media needs to fill the airwaves with an uninterrupted stream of lies curoiously lacking in substance concerning this person, because they sure as shit can't tell you the truth.
Soon there will be nothing more to be done for those that consider the loudest noise to be synonymous with fact. To be tied to their fate would be to be tied at the hip to a lemming.
Not that I would turn down a helping hand, but call me deeply sceptical. I mean, fuck. All you have to do is look at how good the mainstream media in general has been at keeping anything resembling the truth from appearing on the airwaves. Most people have never heard of the demolition of building seven, and the ones that have sure as shit didn't hear about it from cnn. The empire has been invading countries with impunity, taking over governments, seeding mcdonalds and bombing families with unmanned drones, and at the same time what most MSM adherents are worried about are the fucking rhinos, patting themselves on the back for their activism, as sent from their iphone. And then some Jesus-looking actor appears on the very same babble box and calls for revolution. The whole thing stinks.
As a programmer, much of the mental work following my late awakening has been spent towards trying to figure out what the core of the problem is. That problem, as I see it, is blind obedience to authority. It's the reason most people can't see what was done to WTC 7 for what it is, because the man on the teevee said it was a fire. Really, I should stop saying "most people", because as the excellent Washington's Blog reports, more Americans think it was taken down by controlled demolition than believe the account spread by the mainstream media. But it wasn't always like this, and we definitely didn't get here because a celebrity went on teevee and told us it was OK to question the government.
I won't turn down the man's help in spreading awareness, but it should end there and it's obvious that it's not meant to. Already he's being held up as an icon. The things he said, those that I have heard, are elementary truths. Frankly, if what he said is news to anyone, in 2013, I'm not much interested in hearing their solution to global warming and saving the rhino, which are likely to be the only problems on their radar. If anyone has known these things and, following his public unveiling, decided that they now have permission to do something about it, I'm not much interested in hearing their thoughts about activism or liberty. If I wanted sound bites, I would get it straight from the mainstream media's arsehole. Better yet, I would go straight to the same Ye Olde Handbooke of Self-Defeating Activism that they work from.
If this movement turns into another revolution, it will accomplish nothing more than what the empire intended for it: More control, centralised. We don't need a revolution, we need to start thinking for ourselves and living differently. The government has no power that we don't give it, and we don't need to give power to anyone else to solve the problem we created; we need to stop giving our ability away to people who promise to take care of our problems for us.
If we have any hope of accomplishing anything positive with the momentum we have, we have to become a race of self-aware beings: People who can say "I disagree with you and your government", not "My movement disagrees on this issue" or "David Icke said..." or "Plato once wrote...". It's trust of totems and blind agreement with talking heads that got us into this mess and, despite what the fed's handbook says, we're not going to solve anything with more of the same.
It may seem surprising that feminism was created by rich old men, but that appears to be the case. As if the -ism wasn't a blatant enough clue, the goal is the demonisation of men in specific, but generally the demonisation of anything exceptional from the gray goo of sameness that the industry of political correctness is meant to enact on this planet.
The reason for this is relatively simple. Sweatshops aren't generally known to be full of men. Women, yes. Children, yes. But not men, unless you want to install suicide nets around your sweatshops, and that's just bad for PR. This is why women and children (and rhinos) have become first class citizens in the twisted mainstream culture of earth. If all human life is turned into either male apologist pussies, or women desperately trying to untie the Gordian knot of broken logic spouted from the mainstream media, then these rich old men will be free to complete the enslavement of humanity with impunity.
The media and the states suspiciously all together decided that it was illegal to give children a whack or two when they needed it, and surprise surprise, years later they throw up their hands in innocence, wondering why some young people today tend to generally lack discipline, will or any semblance of moral values.
No surprise that the troubles of today's youth dovetail nicely with the recent blitz of terror propaganda in the media concerning rape and rhino poaching. The message behind all this?: "Humanity has lost the ability to control itself, down to the man. Parents are failures (we don't know why), you're probably going to get raped (men are dangerous) and the Chinese are screwing up all the Rhinos (because they're limp). Wouldn't it be nice if an authority took all these problems off our hands?" No surprise that the largely unspoken, pre-fabricated solution to all this is always more control, centralised. That really should be a clue as to who will benefit.
The usual shills are almost in WW3 overdrive now, in the mainstream media and on social networking sites, trying to convince humanity that we're all actually a bunch of well-meaning idiots, unable to deal with simple logic because it wasn't covered in our propaganda. They go largely unchallenged because most people just can't be arsed to point out the obvious.
We have a saying in my country: You're busy scratching the lion's arse with a twig. Soon the new world order initiative will kick off in full, and the rich old men might accomplish something quite different than what they set out to do. But I think most people will simply turn off their teevees, and maybe never turn them on again.
First, they came for the oil.
You will not find the clip on youtube where Louis CK elaborates on the subject, but he discussed it in a clip in Season 2 of his show Louie (Episode: Moving). Since youtube does not allow it to be uploaded, here is a transcription:
And we used to let kings take over for their fathers. That's the craziest rule that ever existed, that if the king dies, they let his kid be the king. What are the odds that he's not gonna be a piece of shit? How do you let that... That's one of the weirdest things that we've ever done as a race of people, I mean all of us. White people... I mean, there are black kings too... African countries. There's never been a black king of england. That's never gonna happen. That's one colour line that's never gonna get... Don't even hope, man. It ain't gonna happen. There's not gonna be a black king of england. I mean, after all that white that's been pumped into their blood for years, they've just been this kind of jizzy white colour for all these generations... Purply... They're all... Every british royal looks like cockmeat. That's what their faces look like, an Irish penis. That's what they look like, someone took an Irishman's penis and stretched it out and drew a face on it with sharpie. [makes face] Just... That's what they look like.
Comedian Louis CK frequently manages to be very funny as well as topical. He's the only person I know of that put rumsfeld on record for being unable to deny being a lizard.
PS: Why do the english royals all look like they're made of cockmeat? As comedian Eddie Izzard points out: "cos it's a bad idea when cousins marry."
Mandela is a terrorist, and not the pretend kind invented to steal other people's resources. The only amazing thing about him is that his case demonstrates the absolute power that the mainstream media has to influence those who seemingly have no will of their own. The beginning of his rule in South Africa marks the beginning of legendary levels of corruption, where his family and the families of many other so-called struggle heroes enriched themselves at the expense of the very same people they were pretending to bomb civilians for in all those long years.
Today, South Africa has fallen apart. The only mirage of organisation that remains is maintained by the lies of an ex-MK member, who surely derives his powers of bullshitting from a head that looks like a pinched loaf. Strikes and violent protests are the everyday norm, and the news for the most part no longer even reports on them, in the same manner that they don't report on the sun rising that morning.
The South African police recently massacred dozens of striking mineworkers in an effort to "maintain order" for the mine. If you don't know: The people who regularly speak about maintaining order actually mean to maintain profitability, either for themselves or their benefactors. Nearly 20 years of democracy in South Africa has demonstrated the very real faults designed into the system, which, like mandela himself, is praised ad nauseum, despite the facts.
Look past the heavy propaganda right now, and you'll find that this post treats him with more respect than his handlers apparently are. After years of being paraded around like some catatonic totem, he has been declared effectively dead, but you would never know it listening to the biggest bullshitters in Africa. Much money has been invested into the "Mandela @ 95" brand name, and you can bet that he will be kept relatively unrotted until such time as most of the party's over, and the greatest media frenzy can be derived from his death.
The wikipedia article for the anc's militant wing still has many details on their attacks on civilian meeting places such as bars and restaurants, but I'll highlight this one section in the post, as it perfectly demonstrates the spirit of the anc's rule in the so-called post-apartheid South Africa:
A bomb was detonated in a bar on the Durban beach-front in 1986, killing three civilians and injuring 69. Robert McBride received the death penalty for this bombing which became known as the "Magoo's Bar bombing". Although the subsequent Truth and Reconciliation Committee called the bombing a "gross violation of human rights", McBride received amnesty and became a senior police officer.
When dealing with the bullshit vendor class of merchants, the questions that don't get answered are usually the important ones. Building 7 is an obvious example, seemingly not existing in the wild and inaccurate saga of 9/11 as it is known in the mainstream.
Exposition in a short article describes bitcoin thus:
Bitcoin is a form of fully-digital currency that is widely used is some (often seedy) corners of the Internet. “Bitcoin mining” refers to the algorithmic process by which Bitcoins are earned. A computer or group of computers attempts to solve an extremely complex equation, and once the answer has been reached, a block of Bitcoins are awarded. The equations get more and more difficult as the years go on to compensate for increased computing power.
It can take years to solve just one of these equations on a single PC, so as a result some people network their PCs in a coordinated effort.
Desperate and short-lived schemes are apparently the staple of collapsing economies. Bitcoin seems to fall into this category, purporting to solve the problem of currency issue, but introducing significant problems of its own. I conclude its moment of prime profit must be short-lived because I strongly suspect that gaping flaws work much better for currencies people were born with, than one that's sold to them in the age in which many persons carry an evolved resistance to infomercials.
It so happens that it is also the age in which giant banks (beneficiaries of the current gaping flaws in currency issue) extract further advantage by using massively powerful server farms and low latency network connections to automate sheep shearing of the stock market, AKA High-Frequncy Trading.
A question you won't find answered relating to bitcoins, is how those who already acquired the most resources would be prevented from extracting unfair advantage via the new system. Bitcon is designed around the premise that more processing power equals more money. Even if the generation of bitcoins could be limited per account, the creation of fake accounts (in effect fake persons) could not be limited without a key component.
The solution to this basic design flaw that we're no doubt meant to come up with—but not until enough people have a stake in the success of the bitcon—is that a hard accounting should be made of all activity by some appointed authority. Being the first true digital, and global, currency, that would require a detailed (and mandatory) centralised global ID system, tied directly to your financial activity.
It is particularly noteworthy that further centralisation is usually the solution offered by the bullshit vendor class of merchant, having extracted all the profit from the problem that it could. Centralisation serves to concentrate control, and means therefore power. It is further noteworthy that control and power (or "order" as it is amorously referred to) is usually sought by those so unable to cope with the realities of existence that they go to extremes to make the universe appear to accord with their limited understandings.